Given the potential health impacts of dual use of tobacco, how acceptable is a short period of dual use while transitioning to less harmful nicotine-containing products? What if many current smokers engage in dual use on a long-term or permanent basis? How might youth initiation be affected by the availability of different nicotine-containing products and how should we account for youth uptake of these products?
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers the University's objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education by publishing worldwide. Sign In or Create an Account. Sign In. Advanced Search. Article Navigation. Close mobile search navigation Article Navigation. Volume Article Contents. Delivery Mechanism Matters.
Nicotine Policy Priorities. Determining Population Health Effects. Declaration of Interests. Oxford Academic. Google Scholar.
Cite Citation. Permissions Icon Permissions. Delivery Mechanism Matters Nicotine does not directly cause the estimated deaths 1 each year from smoking-related diseases. Help Shape Lifesaving Policy To gather information from researchers, as well as from public health experts, industry representatives, and other stakeholders, FDA is involved in an ongoing public dialogue on issues relevant to nicotine and tobacco policy. Challenging questions include: How comfortable are we with long-term, or possibly permanent, use of less harmful nicotine delivery mechanisms by adults, if they help keep currently addicted smokers from relapsing to combustible tobacco products?
How much weight should be placed on diminished interest in quitting nicotine altogether? Can we revise labeling and indications for medicinal nicotine to increase quitting? Declaration of Interests None declared. References 1. Research opportunities related to establishing standards for tobacco products under the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act. Search ADS. Pub L No. Tobacco product standard for nicotine level of combusted cigarettes: a proposed rule. Potential public health effects of reducing nicotine levels in cigarettes in the United States.
N Engl J Med.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Furthermore, additional overhead and user fees that come with regulation will make it very difficult for small tobacco and e-cig companies to absorb the costs and survive in the market. Not only is the inclusion of the industry on this committee akin to letting the fox guard the henhouse, it runs counter to a treaty provision that obligates ratifying countries to safeguard their health policies against tobacco industry interference.
Much more complex and far-reaching, the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act is just beginning to be implemented, and in the short term, in practice at least, some progress is being made and deadlines met. Reasoning and results, however, appear mixed. On June 30, , for example, the FDA announced that it was seeking public input on the implementation of the new law, indicating particular interest "…in comments on the approaches and actions the agency should consider initially to increase the likelihood of reducing the incidence and prevalence of tobacco product use and protecting the public health.amapitpe.ml/2905.php
Electronic, or E-Cigarette, and other Electronic Smoking Devices Policy Adoption
Meanwhile, on August 19, , the FDA launched its new Center for Tobacco Products to oversee implementation of the act, appointing as its first director Dr. In addition, the agency officially established the Tobacco Products Scientific Advisory Committee, lambasted by Mulvey. On September 22, , fruit- and candy-flavored cigarettes became illegal, ahead of the October deadline.
The next day, Kretek International Inc. The very next day, Dr.
In Focus - Winter
Siegel noted in a tobaccoanalysis. Reynolds confirmed that they have no products on the market which are covered by the cigarette flavoring ban Instead, the law forced the removal of some minor products made by small manufacturers News and World Report on the subject; but the same article reported that flavored cigarettes account for only 1 percent of the cigarette market.
In situations where the science is less fully developed or the issues are complex or controversial, and both are the case here, regulation development requires much more time. Time, coupled with commitment, effective enforcement, industry cooperation, and public and political support and advocacy. There will be controversy, but there will also be conversation and consensus.
It addresses a looming, and preventable, health issue in a national context, and as a national priority. And like the New York City smoking ban, which became a state-wide mandate in and was replicated across cities and countries worldwide, this ambitious U. Warning labels like this are coming Winter Vol.
Tobacco Legislation Spurs Global Advances. Under the new U. Compiled from multiple sources.
- The Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (a.k.a. FDA Regulations HR 1256)?
- The Art of Reading.
- The Legend Remains;
- Bills in the 111th Congress.
Close mobile search navigation Article Navigation. Volume Electronic cigarettes: Safety concerns and regulatory issues Kristine A. Wollscheid, B.
Address correspondence to Ms. Oxford Academic. Google Scholar. Mary E. Kremzner, Pharm. Cite Citation. Permissions Icon Permissions. All rights reserved. Issue Section:. You do not currently have access to this article. Download all figures. Comments 0. Add comment Close comment form modal. I agree to the terms and conditions. You must accept the terms and conditions. Add comment Cancel. Submit a comment.
Related Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act [H.R. 1256]
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved